Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Law (6489)
- Legal Studies (6433)
- Sociology (6419)
- Criminal Law (6418)
- Criminology (6410)
-
- Criminology and Criminal Justice (6394)
- Legal Theory (29)
- Law and Society (24)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (23)
- Legal History (21)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (20)
- Courts (18)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (16)
- Constitutional Law (16)
- Jurisprudence (15)
- Arts and Humanities (13)
- Litigation (13)
- International Law (12)
- Political Science (12)
- Law and Politics (11)
- Law and Race (10)
- Administrative Law (9)
- Criminal Procedure (9)
- Economics (8)
- Human Rights Law (8)
- Public Administration (8)
- Social Welfare Law (8)
- State and Local Government Law (8)
- American Studies (7)
- Keyword
-
- Public Law and Legal Theory (17)
- Jurisprudence (12)
- International law (11)
- Conflicts of law (private international law) (7)
- Evidence (6)
-
- Courts (5)
- Data (5)
- International Law (5)
- Justice (5)
- Law and politics (5)
- Litigation, alternative dispute resolution, and remedies (5)
- Chicago (4)
- Criminal law (4)
- Criminal law and procedure (4)
- Data justice (4)
- Discrimination (4)
- Education (4)
- International courts and tribunals (4)
- International relations and national security (4)
- Judicial decisions (4)
- Law (4)
- Medical jurisprudence (4)
- Race (4)
- AI (3)
- Artificial intelligence (3)
- Capital punishment (3)
- Constitutional law (3)
- Court data (3)
- Death penalty (3)
- Diversity (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 6495
Full-Text Articles in Social and Behavioral Sciences
A Few Steps Toward An Explanatory Theory Of International Law, Anthony D'Amato
A Few Steps Toward An Explanatory Theory Of International Law, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
If any one sentence about international law has stood the test of time, it is Louis Henkin's: "almost all nations observe almost all principles of international law and almost all of their obligations almost all of the time." If this is true, why is this true? What makes it true? How do nations invent rules that then turn around and bind them? Are international rules simply pragmatic and expedient? Or do they embody values such as the need for international cooperation? Is international law a mixed game of conflict and cooperation because of its rules, or do its rules make …
Federal Circuit Patent Precedent: An Empirical Study Of Institutional Authority And Ip Ideology, David Pekarek-Krohn, Emerson H. Tiller
Federal Circuit Patent Precedent: An Empirical Study Of Institutional Authority And Ip Ideology, David Pekarek-Krohn, Emerson H. Tiller
Faculty Working Papers
In this paper, we aim to better understand the institutional authority of the Federal Circuit as a source of law as well as the influence of pro-patent and anti-patent ideological forces at play between the Supreme Court, Federal Circuit, and the district courts. Our specific focus is on the district courts and how they cite Federal Circuit precedent relative to Supreme Court precedent to support their decisions, whether they be pro-patent or anti-patent. Using a variety of citation approaches and statistical tests, we find that federal district courts treat the Federal Circuit as more authoritative (compared to the Supreme Court) …
Methodological Advances And Empirical Legal Scholarship: A Note On The Cox And Miles' Voting Rights Act Study, Nancy Staudt, Tyler Vanderweele
Methodological Advances And Empirical Legal Scholarship: A Note On The Cox And Miles' Voting Rights Act Study, Nancy Staudt, Tyler Vanderweele
Faculty Working Papers
In this Response, we use Professors Cox and Miles' recent study of judicial decision-making to explore what is at stake when legal scholars present empirical findings without fully investigating the structural relationships of their data or without explicitly stating the assumptions being made to draw causal inferences. We then introduce a new methodology that is intuitive, easy to use, and, most importantly, allows scholars systematically to assess problems of bias and confounding. This methodology—known as causal directed acyclic graphs—will help empirical researchers to identify true cause and effect relationships when they exist and, at the same time, posit statistical models …
Economic Trends And Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory Of The Court, Thomas Brennan, Lee Epstein, Nancy Staudt
Economic Trends And Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory Of The Court, Thomas Brennan, Lee Epstein, Nancy Staudt
Faculty Working Papers
In this symposium essay, we investigate the effect of economic conditions on the voting behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. We theorize that Justices are akin to voters in political elections; specifically, we posit that the Justices will view short-term and relatively minor economic downturns—recessions—as attributable to the failures of elected officials, but will consider long-term and extreme economic contractions—depressions—as the result of exogenous shocks largely beyond the control of the government. Accordingly, we predict two patterns of behavior in economic-related cases that come before the Court: (1) in typical times, when the economy cycles through both recessionary and prosperous …
The Ultimate Injustice: When A Court Misstates The Facts, Anthony D'Amato
The Ultimate Injustice: When A Court Misstates The Facts, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
This essay deals with what "the law" did to Dr. Branion, an American citizen, after the jury convicted him of murder in 1968. Under the American legal system, a defendant is entitled to have his case reviewed by a higher court, and, under certain circumstances, if the appellate review is unsuccessful, to present a petition for habeas corpus to a state or federal court. I will focus primarily on the stage of his litigation with which I am most familiar: his pursuit of a habeas remedy in federal court between 1986 and 1989. I will try to explain how one …
Aspects Of Deconstruction: The "Easy Case" Of The Under-Aged President, Anthony D'Amato
Aspects Of Deconstruction: The "Easy Case" Of The Under-Aged President, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
When the deconstructionist says that all cases are to some degree problematic, the mainstream legal scholar gleefully pulls out a favorite crystal-clear case and asserts "not this one!" Judging from the law review commentary, the most popular of these "easy cases" concerns the constitutional mandate that the President shall be at least thirty-five years of age. Deconstructionists say that all interpretation depends on context. Radical deconstructionists add that, because contexts can change, there can be no such thing as a single interpretation of any text that is absolute and unchanging for all time.
easy case, deconstruction in law, US Constitution …
Aspects Of Deconstruction: Refuting Indeterminacy With One Bold Thought, Anthony D'Amato
Aspects Of Deconstruction: Refuting Indeterminacy With One Bold Thought, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
Deconstruction has already happened on the Supreme Court. Not only can no member of the Court really believe that "the law" (self-invented by the very Court it is supposed to govern!) can constrain the result in any individual case, but its members have also convinced themselves that they have no time to be concerned with dispensing justice to the parties. The justificatory legal language used in judicial opinions is not what our law teachers told us it was. The justificatory legal language is not provided to explain—much less constrain—the result in the case. Rather, it is a mode of couching …
Is International Law Part Of Natural Law?, Anthony D'Amato
Is International Law Part Of Natural Law?, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
The affinity of international law to natural law goes back a long way to the classic writers of international law. "Natural law" is the method of dispute resolution based on a conscious attempt to perpetuate past similarities in dispute resolution. "International law" has a deep affinity to this natural law method, for it consists of those practices that have "worked" in inter-nation conflict resolution.
Can Any Legal Theory Constrain Any Judicial Decision?, Anthony D'Amato
Can Any Legal Theory Constrain Any Judicial Decision?, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
A growing number of legal scholars have recently revived the American legal realist thesis that legal theory does not dictate the result in any particular case because legal theory itself is indeterminate. A more radical group has added that theory can never constrain judicial practice. I will present a spectrum of types of legal theories to demonstrate that the position of the more radical group of writers is correct—that legal theory is inherently incapable of identifying which party should win any given case.
Pragmatic Indeterminacy, Anthony D'Amato
Pragmatic Indeterminacy, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
If, as a result of taking Indeterminacy seriously, we revolutionize the way we teach law and the way we select judges, then we will also revolutionize the way cases are litigated (because the new judges will expect to hear a different kind of argumentation) and the way people order their lives in anticipation of the way their disputes will be decided by these new judges.
Legal And Moral Dimensions Of Churchill's Failure To Warn, Anthony D'Amato
Legal And Moral Dimensions Of Churchill's Failure To Warn, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
Churchill had been given at least forty-eight hours' warning that Coventry would be hit. He could have warned the people of Coventry of the impending attack. Yet Churchill determined that any advance warning to the people of Coventry would have enabled the Germans to deduce that their top secret code had been broken. The coded intercepts provided evidence of the Holocaust in progress. Other ways to reveal information that could have by-passed the code system existed, thus providing warning to the public while maintaining a strategic advantage. The international law of genocide would have to develop to go beyond intentional …
There Is No Norm Of Intervention Or Non-Intervention In International Law, Anthony D'Amato
There Is No Norm Of Intervention Or Non-Intervention In International Law, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
Comments on Prof. Jianming Shen's position that humanitarian intervention is unlawful under international law and that there is a principle of non-intervention in international law that is so powerful that it amounts to a jus cogens prohibition.
Legal Realism Explains Nothing, Anthony D'Amato
Legal Realism Explains Nothing, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
I argue that American legal realism as derived from Oliver Wendell Holmes's prediction theory of law was misinterpreted, and that a deeper examination of law-as-prediction might help to reduce the pathology of judicial lawmaking that has been the unfortunate consequence of legal realism.
The Moral And Legal Basis For Sanctions, Anthony D'Amato
The Moral And Legal Basis For Sanctions, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
In order to analyze the moral and legal basis for sanctions in international relations, we have to begin at a stage where there is no centralized government in place. We first need to get a picture of the range of possible sanctions. Next, we need to see what role sanctions play in the international system. Finally, we turn to the intertwined moral and legal considerations that make well-designed sanctions efficacious in today's world. The fundamental objective of sanctions in interstate relations is to make it expensive for a target state to refrain from doing what the sanctioning state wants it …
World Conferences And The Cheapening Of International Norms, Anthony D'Amato
World Conferences And The Cheapening Of International Norms, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
As long as we understand that world conferences only address problems, we will not be disappointed in them. We will only be disappointed if we think that a world conference is supposed to solve problems. Is there any point in getting a lot of people together, at great expense, just to address a problem without any prospect of solving it? My answer is a qualified yes. A world conference is a cultural artifact. It has an impact upon our collective sense of civilization.
The Speluncean Explorers--Further Proceedings, Anthony D'Amato
The Speluncean Explorers--Further Proceedings, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
Lon L. Fuller's The Case of the Speluncean Explorers is a classic in jurisprudence. The case presents five judicial opinions which clash with each other and produce for the reader an exhilarating excursion into fundamental theories of law and the state and the role of courts vis-i-vis legislatures and executives. Though the issues articulated by Fuller are timeless, the past thirty years in jurisprudential scholarship have produced at least one major new vantage point—the "rights thesis".
The Limits Of Legal Realism, Anthony D'Amato
The Limits Of Legal Realism, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
This article will address some criticisms of legal realism, primarily those of H.L.A. Hart, that have been unanswered in the literature and have appeared to discredit the realist approach to law. The article will also articulate what I believe to be more difficult problems with legal realism.
Legal Uncertainty, Anthony D'Amato
Legal Uncertainty, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
Legal certainty decreases over time. Rules and principles of law become more and more uncertain in content and in application because legal systems are biased in favor of unravelling those rules and principles. In this article I attempt to show what these biases are, and why commentators who have argued that the law tends toward certainty are wrong, then describe various attempts which have been made at restoring certainty, and why these attempts have generally not worked. My conclusion is that these proposals are at best holding actions, and that the tendency toward increasing uncertainty in the law is inexorable.
Is Equality A Totally Empty Idea?, Anthony D'Amato
Is Equality A Totally Empty Idea?, Anthony D'Amato
Faculty Working Papers
Comments on Westen article The Empty Idea of Equality. The only way we know what direction to move in making reductions and increases in burdens is to have a concept of equality in mind. The only way we can know that one burden is 'great' and another burden is 'considerably lesser,' to use the words in Westen's standard, is to compare the burdens. But comparison presupposes a measure of equality, for we cannot know that one burden is greater than another unless we first have a concept of when the two burdens are equal. Westen's standard, therefore, is logically posterior …
Two Wrongs Make A Wrong: A Challenge To Plea Bargaining And Collateral Consequence Statutes Through Their Integration, Kevin O'Keefe
Two Wrongs Make A Wrong: A Challenge To Plea Bargaining And Collateral Consequence Statutes Through Their Integration, Kevin O'Keefe
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.
Efficiency And Cost: The Impact Of Videoconferenced Hearings On Bail Decisions, Shari Seidman Diamond, Locke E. Bowman, Manyee Wong, Matthew M. Patton
Efficiency And Cost: The Impact Of Videoconferenced Hearings On Bail Decisions, Shari Seidman Diamond, Locke E. Bowman, Manyee Wong, Matthew M. Patton
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.
A Century Of Criminal Law And Criminology, Amy Deline, Adair Crosley
A Century Of Criminal Law And Criminology, Amy Deline, Adair Crosley
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.
The Rise And Fall Of The American Institute Of Criminal Law And Criminology, Jennifer Devroye
The Rise And Fall Of The American Institute Of Criminal Law And Criminology, Jennifer Devroye
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.
Provoking Change: Comparative Insights On Feminist Homicide Law Reform, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Provoking Change: Comparative Insights On Feminist Homicide Law Reform, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.
Learning From Error In American Criminal Justice, James M. Doyle
Learning From Error In American Criminal Justice, James M. Doyle
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.
When The Law Preserves Injustice: Issues Raised By A Wrongful Incarceration Exception To Attorney-Client Confidentiality, Inbal Hasbani
When The Law Preserves Injustice: Issues Raised By A Wrongful Incarceration Exception To Attorney-Client Confidentiality, Inbal Hasbani
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.
Denying Defendants The Benefit Of A Reasonable Doubt: Federal Rule Of Evidence 609 And Past Sex Crime Convictions, Julia T. Rickert
Denying Defendants The Benefit Of A Reasonable Doubt: Federal Rule Of Evidence 609 And Past Sex Crime Convictions, Julia T. Rickert
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.
A Century Of Criminal Law And Criminology, Amy Deline
A Century Of Criminal Law And Criminology, Amy Deline
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.
Reforming The Law On Show-Up Identifications, Michael D. Cicchini, Joseph G. Easton
Reforming The Law On Show-Up Identifications, Michael D. Cicchini, Joseph G. Easton
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.
A Reason To Doubt: The Suppression Of Evidence And The Inference Of Innocence, Cynthia E. Jones
A Reason To Doubt: The Suppression Of Evidence And The Inference Of Innocence, Cynthia E. Jones
Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology
No abstract provided.